An echo is sound reverberating off a mountain, hill or wall; a reflection of a sound, heard again; a person [or group of people] reflecting the ideas, opinions, or action of someone else. In Classical Mythology, Echo was a mountain nymph who longed for the love of Narcissus until all that was left of her was her voice (Definitions of 'echo'). Has America become only an echo of the shining light on the hill that it once was?[1] Is it only an imitation of its former self? Does it still possess the voice capable of ringing from the mountaintops? Before I get too sentimental carried away with ideology, we need to reflect further on these questions.
Standing on the precipice of 2008 America is poised on a year of change. The most obvious and most visible will be the selection of a new president to lead the country. In eleven months, Americans will make their decision. In a little over a year, a new voice will be heard coming from the Presidential pulpit. Will this voice be strong and new, or a mere echo of all that has been said before? Will voters turn out to re-elect someone who sounds like everyone else or someone who sounds different? Will American’s exercise their democratic right (some say duty) and show up at the polls or will they leave the decision making up to those who do get involved. A recent Harvard Law Review Note argues a case for compulsory voting in America. The argument considers the fact that only about 60% of Americans voted in the 2004 presidential election. The note cites sources that put European voting at over 80% (The Case for Compulsory Voting in the United States, 2007). New Zealand’s Ministry of Social Development reported that in the last general election (2005) there was a 77% voter turned out (Ministry of Social Development, 2007). America considers itself to be the proponent of liberty and democracy, yet it falls behind when it comes to demonstrating its commitment to the democratic process. Is voter turnout an indication that the American voice is dwindling into an echo? Or is it a sign that there is waning trust in the institutions and individuals who govern it?
Financial challenges also face America in 2008. The sub-prime mortgage crisis that I wrote about previously, is probably only the beginning. Financial institutions will continue to be hurt by the ongoing uncertainty caused by this crisis. The price of gold is surging towards record highs, this in part due the weakening American Dollar (The Associated Press, 2008). It took America years of struggle to establish itself on the world stage. Its citizen’s worked hard, made sacrifices, and were commitment to the ideals of the American dream. As a result, it grew into the economic powerhouse of the 20th century. It now lags behind many developing economies. For 2008, the International Monetary Fund is projecting that US Gross Domestic Product [GDP] will grow by 1.9% while its projections for other emerging and developing markets will grow by 7.4% (International Monetary Fund, 2007). A note of caution – economist think that GDP is not an accurate indicator of economic wealth. Economist have been increasingly questioning the usefulness of the data gathered to generate GDP, particularly since it fails to reflect key elements such as the value of volunteerism, the cost of natural resource depletion, and tasks formally done by individuals that are not done by service industries (like child care and house cleaning) (Robert D. Hershey, 1995).
If America wants to be more than an echo in the 21st century, then political and economic restoration, both domestically and internationally, are vital to reclaiming its voice. Having read or heard about the rise and decline of great civilizations, I have often reflected on where America is in the cycle. I came across this concept recently in Michael LeGault’s book Think. He cites historian James Anthony Froude who summarizes this cycle: “Virtue and truth produce strength, strength dominion, dominion riches, riches luxury and luxury weakness and collapse – the fatal sequence repeated so often” (LeGault, 2006, p. 321). America’s richness and luxury may be giving way to weakness and collapse, but it is not too late. If it wishes to get its voice back it must be prepared to sacrifice again. This will be a painful thing for those American’s who may feel like they have been making sacrifices over the last few years. It will mean settling for lifestyles that are within our means. It will mean helping out those who are less fortunate than us. It means voicing our opinions. It also means closing our mouths, opening our ears and listening to the opinions of others. A voice must be heard and to be heard it must be listened to. It is not enough for us to allow everyone to just have an opinion. We must restore the expectation that if an opinion if voiced, the one voicing that opinion should also be willing to backed up and defended it. In a politically correct society, we expect that we can say whatever we want and others will have to accept it because we say it. In a democratic society, one that is healthy and robust, there is room for plenty of opinion. However, we must also fight to make room for those opinions to be challenged, modified and even recast if needs be.
The Founders fought long and hard to form the words of the Declaration and Constitution. They argued over words and meaning of words. They knew the magnitude of what they were writing and knew the importance of getting it right. They were aware of the impact of spoken and written word: “We hold these truths to be self-evident” and “We, the people of the United States….” They used these words for a reason. They did not write “We, the Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Muslims and Hindus” or “We, the English, French, Polish and German of the United States” or “Some of us hold these truths and some of hold other truths to be self-evident.” I hope you get the point. They were not satisfied to throw out a few thoughts and opinions on government. They would not have expected a government formed on the opinions of one or two to stand for over two hundred years. They debated and argued their thoughts and opinions. But here’s the crucial part, they came to a conclusion, a compromise that they decided they could live with. A politically correct society is apt either to compromise without conclusion or come to conclusions without compromise. The Founders considered the difficulty and challenges they faced as worthwhile because they believed that it would lead to a better future for their children and grandchildren. America must restore its focus on the future. It cannot let a materialistic ‘me’ generation take hold or else the riches and luxuries that our parents and grandparents worked so hard for will lead to weakness and decay. America must rediscover what its virtues and truths are if it is to return to a position of strength. I choose not to name those virtues and truth, because I believe an ongoing healthy debate and discussion is always required to sort out what they are or should be.
America (and the world) stands on the precipice of a New Year, a year that will bring many new challenges. Collectively and individually it must make a crucial decision. Will the voices of the Founders become merely an echo, a shadow of what was? Or, will its people find their voice again and again proclaim, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
In closing, I want to share few words from one of America’s Founding Mothers. Abigail Adams, in a farewell note to her son John, wrote about the times in which they lived and the importance of taking full advantage of them, not only for the present, but for future generations. She wrote:
It will be expected of you, my son, that as you are favored with superior advantages under the instructive eye of a tender parent, that your improvements should bear some proportion to your advantages. These are the times in which a genius would wish to live. It is not in the still calm of life, or the repose of a pacific station, that great characters are formed. The habits of a vigorous mind are formed in contending with difficulties. Great necessities call out great virtues. When a mind is raised, and animated by scenes that engage the heart, then those qualities which would otherwise lay dormant, wake into life and form the character of the hero and the statesmen. (McCullough, 2001)
May America rediscovery its virtues and truths, and in restored character, contend with the difficulties it now faces.
Bibliography
Clinton, W. J. (2004). My Life. London: Hutchinson.
Definitions of 'echo'. (n.d.). Retrieved January 5, 2008, from Dictionary.com: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/echo
International Monetary Fund. (2007, October). Data and Statistics. Retrieved January 5, 2008, from International Monetary Fund: http://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/index.php
LeGault, M. (2006). Think: Why crucial decisions can't be made in the blink of an eye. New York: Threshold.
McCullough, D. (2001). John Adams. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Ministry of Social Development. (2007). Voter Turnout. Retrieved January 5, 2008, from The Social Report: http://www.socialreport.msd.govt.nz/civil-political-rights/voter-turnout.html
Robert D. Hershey, J. (1995, December 19). Business - Counting the Wealth of Nations;G.D.P.'s Accuracy Is Under Attack From All Sides. Retrieved January 5, 2008, from The New York Times: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9803E5DC1439F93AA25751C1A963958260
The Associated Press. (2008, January 3). Gold Futures Near Record High. Retrieved January 2008, 5, from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Commodities-Review.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
The Case for Compulsory Voting in the United States. (2007, December). Retrieved January 5, 2008, from Harvard Law Review: http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/121/dec07/notes/compulsory_voting.pdf
[1] Bill Clinton, in his autobiography, reflects on his journey through Russia and the Baltic States in the late 60s, recalls that American Democracy was still seen by those under communist rule as ‘a beacon of light.’ See (Clinton, 2004, p. 170)